Salam semua!
Di sini saya kongsikan pandangan Raja Petra Kamarudin tentang isu ini dalam portal beliau.Memang beliau adalah seorang yang rebel terhadap pemerintah,namun fakta tetap fakta dan seorang yang terpelajar seperti beliau tahu bahawa menentang pemerintah yang korup bukan bermakna menipu sejarah sekali.
enjoy!
link di sini>> http://www.malaysia-today.net/the-malays-are-not-pendatang/
So let us be clear about the definition of pendatang. All those Malays who moved from one island to another but within the Malay Archipelago are not pendatang.
It is just like Malays from Penang moving to Selangor. The cut-off date
would be after the different sovereign states were created in the 20th
Century.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
All the three key races that form Malaysia’s majority — the Malays, Chinese and Indians — are immigrants or
pendatangs,
even though the Malays, as the country’s dominant ethnic group, are
given Bumiputera status, a Gerakan delegate, Tan Lai Soon, said today.
Tan said that supporters of Umno, who have in the past referred to
the Chinese as immigrants, did not realise that even the Malays do not
originate from Malaysia.
“I want to explain Malaysians’ position. The Malays, Chinese, Indians, are all
pendatangs
(immigrants) other than the indigenous people, Sabahans, Sarawakians —
the original Bumiputera. So when Umno’s people say the Chinese are
pendatang, they didn’t think that they are also pendatang from
Indonesia,” said Tan.
Actually, Tan is not quite correct because he is looking at Malaysia
as a sovereign nation separate from Indonesia, Philippines and Southern
Thailand. Those are boundaries created by the European colonialists
since the 16th Century. Prior to that, Indonesia, Philippines, Southern
Thailand (up to the Isthmus of Kra), Singapore, East Timor and Brunei
did not exist. What existed was just the Malay Archipelago.
The Malay Archipelago has been defined as an island group of
Southeast Asia between Australia and the Asian mainland and separating
the Indian and Pacific oceans. It includes what we now call Indonesia,
Philippines, Malaysia, Southern Thailand (up to the Isthmus of Kra),
Singapore, East Timor and Brunei.
About 1,400 years ago, at the time of Prophet Muhammad, the Malay
Archipelago, the name the Europeans gave this region, was part of the
Srivijaya Empire. In the 13th Century, this was replaced by the
Majapahit Empire until the 16th Century and still included those
countries mentioned.
The language of this region was old Malay, old Javanese and Sanskrit with Buddhism and Hinduism as its main religions.
It was in the 16th Century that the Spanish, Dutch and Portuguese
started coming to the Malay Archipelago and began dividing up the
territory, just like what the Europeans did to the Ottoman Empire after
the First World War (and the cause of all those problems in the Middle
East today).
Hence it would be incorrect to say that the Malays are
pendatang
or immigrants, at least not the original Malays of the 600s to 1800s.
There was certainly movement of people between the different islands as
well as the Malay Peninsula plus Thailand. But these people were not
immigrants because this movement was still within the same empire or
territory.
When Tan says that the Malays, too, are immigrants to Malaysia, he
has to clarify what period he was referring to. The Straits Settlements,
the Federated Malay States, the Unfederated Malay States and British
Borneo did not come into existence until the 19th Century. From then on
British Malaya came into being.
For purposes of history, all those people who came to British Malaya since 1850 could be correctly referred to as
pendatang
or immigrants (the date when the British immigration policy was
launched to bring in Chinese and Indians from China and India). Prior to
1850, we cannot call the Malays from Java, Sumatra, etc., as
pendatang.
So let us be clear about the definition of
pendatang. All those Malays who moved from one island to another but within the Malay Archipelago are not
pendatang.
It is just like Malays from Penang moving to Selangor. The cut-off date
would be after the different sovereign states were created in the 20th
Century.
For example, when my family moved to Selangor in the 18th Century,
Selangor was not yet part of British Malaya but was an independent
territory under Perak control. At that time, the Bugis Johor-Riau Empire
controlled that region. It was not until the 19th Century when the
British and Dutch signed a treaty in London that the Empire was carved
up and eventually ended.
Today, any Bugis from Indonesia who comes to Selangor can be called a
pendatang. But in the 18th Century we were not
pendatang. That is a historical fact.
*************************************************
The Malay Archipelago is the largest group of islands in the world,
consisting of the more than 17,000 islands of Indonesia and the
approximately 7,000 islands of the Philippines. The principal islands
and groups of the Republic of Indonesia include the Greater Sundas
(Sumatra, Java, Borneo, and Celebes), the Lesser Sundas, the Moluccas,
and western New Guinea. The main islands of the Philippines include
Luzon (north), Mindanao (south), and the Visayas in between. Other
political units in the archipelago are East Malaysia (Sabah and
Sarawak), Brunei, and Papua New Guinea.
Encyclopædia Britannica
*************************************************
Definition and Boundaries
For reasons which depend mainly on the distribution of animal life, I
consider the Malay Archipelago to include the Malay Peninsula as far as
Tenasserim and the Nicobar Islands on the west, the Philippines on the
north, and the Solomon Islands, beyond New Guinea, on the east. All the
great islands included within these limits are connected together by
innumerable smaller ones, so that no one of them seems to be distinctly
separated from the rest.
By Alfred Russel Wallace, The Malay Archipelago.
~Cik Seri
cikgu srikandi best :D
ReplyDeleteAnamisma itu ugama apa. Bukan kah sebelum islam datang kebanyakan orang melayu berfahaman anamisma macam orang asli hari ini.
ReplyDeleteorg cina butthurt haha...very funny la depa ni...seriously mereka buta sejarah
ReplyDeleteanimisme tu bukan agama tapi kepercayaan.. animisme bermaksud percaya bahawa setiap benda mempunyai roh/semangat. Sebelum islam datang, ada bnyk agama.. ntah laa.
ReplyDeletekenapa la sejarah sekolah dan cikgu2 x pernah cerita pasal benda ni...??
ReplyDelete